Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join Us
Site Search
Legal Flash
Blog Home All Blogs
News for, and by, our local legal community, curated and created by the Santa Clara County Bar. The opinions expressed in this blog are the authors' own and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of the Santa Clara County Bar Association, its members, its employees, or its governing board.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Officers  recognition  Santa Clara County Court  2016  Barrister of the Year  Barristers  Board of Trustees  Civil Practice  cyber insurance  Cybersecurity  diversity  ExCom  E-Z Legal Forms  Grand Jury  High Technology  Insurance Section  Judge Pichon  Judiciary  Lawyers in the Community  mediation  Mlnarik  Pichon  Presiding Judge  Rise Pichon  sccba  Volunteer  WLS  Women Lawyers Section 

Los Angeles’ historic - and infamous - Hall of Justice reopens after 20 years

Posted By Administration, Thursday, October 9, 2014

LOS ANGELES — County officials gathered today to mark the reopening of the long-shuttered downtown Hall of Justice.

District Attorney Jackie Lacey and county Supervisors Michael Antonovich, Don Knabe, Gloria Molina, Mark Ridley-Thomas and Zev Yaroslavsky joined Interim Sheriff John Scott to dedicate the new home of the Sheriff’s Department and District Attorney’s Office.

Built in 1925, the iconic beaux arts structure sits across the street from the criminal courthouse and on a diagonal from City Hall. The exterior granite of the 14-story building has been cleaned from gray to gleaming ivory and the marble grand lobby and multistory loggia have also been restored.

Read the whole story at Los Angeles Daily News.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

California State Bar Honors UCI Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky for Body of Work

Posted By Administration, Monday, October 6, 2014

 

 

The State Bar of California has bestowed its 2014 Bernard E. Witkin Medal--which is given to individuals who have helped shape the legal landscape through an extraordinary body of work--to UC Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

Erwin Chemerinsky, UCI Law School Dean, Argues Free-Speech Case Before Supreme Court

"Dean Chemerinsky's intellectual IQ is off the charts, but he's also a great humanitarian," said State Bar President Craig Holden in presenting the medal to Chemerinsky at the State Bar's recent annual meeting in San Diego.

"I am deeply honored to have received the Witkin Medal, named for one of the true giants in the history of California's legal system: Bernard Witkin," Chemerinsky said. "As I look at those who have received this award before me, I am truly humbled to see my name with theirs."

Read more via OCWeeklyhttp://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2014/10/erwin_chemerinsky_state_bar_medal_bernard_e_witkin.php

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

President has a short list of potential attorney general candidates

Posted By Administration, Friday, October 3, 2014

 

 

A week after Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. announced plans to step down, three administration insiders lead the president's short list to replace him, according to sources inside and outside the White House.

 

Solicitor Gen. Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who successfully argued the administration's case for the Affordable Care Act before the Supreme Court, is mentioned more frequently than the other top candidates: Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez, a progressive considered by the White House to be a Cabinet standout, and former White House Counsel Kathryn H. Ruemmler.

 

Perez was a lightening rod for Republican criticism when he headed the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division and barely squeezed through his confirmation last year. His nomination as America's top law enforcement official would provoke a major battle in the Senate.

 

Read more from LATimes: http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-attorney-general-20141003-story.html

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Beleaguered Santa Clara County judge stops campaigning

Posted By Administration, Friday, October 3, 2014

After sinking more than $190,000 of her own money into her re-election campaign, Judge Diane Ritchie announced Thursday that she will no longer actively participate in a bruising race that has focused on her struggles to learn the job during a first term marked by gaffes.

Ritchie's name will still appear on the November ballot for her Santa Clara County Superior Court seat. But she said in a note to supporters on her campaign website that she will not spend any more of her own money in her re-election bid against prosecutor Matt Harris or answer questions from the press.

"I will not engage in this antagonistic campaign process, which I believe is damaging to our democracy and our courts," she said in her statement, adding that the campaign has been "challenging" and has taken a toll on her personal and professional life. "It is unseemly for a judge to engage in this type of politics."

However, she still hopes to win. "But I can and do ask for your support and your vote," she said.

The announcement comes as Ritchie finds herself increasingly ostracized by area lawyers, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges, many of whom refuse to endorse her or have actively boycotted her court. A report in this newspaper early this year highlighted her rough adjustment to becoming a judge and inspired critics and re-election challengers to come forward. She also faces new criticism about her unorthodox request to Campbell city councilman and lawyer Jason Baker for help with her campaign while his client's case was still pending before her.

 

Read more from Bay Area News: http://www.insidebayarea.com/bay-area-news/ci_26650145/beleaguered-judge-stops-campaigning

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Supreme Court Committee Provides Guidance on Appearing at Public Hearings

Posted By Administration, Friday, October 3, 2014

Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions advises judges on commenting at 
public hearings and consulting with the Legislature

 

SAN FRANCISCO—The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO) has issued an advisory opinion providing guidance to judges about appearing at public hearings and consulting with the other branches of government. The opinion clarifies what comments the California Code of Judicial Ethics authorizes judges to make concerning the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. The opinion cautions, however, that even when making permitted statements, judges still must take care not to violate any other provisions of the Code of Judicial Ethics, for example, by commenting on pending or future proceedings in any court, or by taking a position with respect to the outcome of cases. 

Judges are prohibited from appearing at public hearings as a general matter, but an exception permits them to appear and consult on “matters concerning the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice.” (Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, canon 4C(1).) The opinion:

  • examines this exception and points out how robust participation by judges benefits the public and the members of executive and legislative branches of government;
  • advises that the exception broadly permits judges to comment and consult on the court system or matters of judicial administration, which are inherently within judicial experience and perspective; and
  • concludes that the exception also permits judges to speak about legal matters when their experience and perspective as judges uniquely qualifies them to assist the other branches of the government in fulfilling their responsibilities to the public.

 

The committee previously invited the public to comment on this advisory opinion in draft form. Those comments submitted with a waiver of confidentiality are posted for public view on the CJEO website. All of the comments the committee received were carefully considered by the CJEO members when finalizing and approving CJEO Formal Opinion No. 2014-006.

CJEO is an independent committee appointed by the Supreme Court to help inform the judiciary and the public concerning judicial ethics topics. CJEO was established as part of the court’s constitutional responsibility to guide the conduct of judges and judicial candidates (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (m)). In making appointments to serve on CJEO, the court selects members of the bench with a strong background in judicial ethics and diverse courtroom experience. The current twelve CJEO members are justices, judges, a commissioner, and a retired bench officer who have served in courts of various sizes throughout the state.

CJEO publishes formal opinions, issues confidential informal opinions, and provides oral advice on proper judicial conduct pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics and other authorities (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.80(e)(1)). CJEO acts independently of the Supreme Court, the Commission on Judicial Performance, the Judicial Council, and all other entities (rule 9.80(b)).

For more information about CJEO, visit the CJEO website and view the members’ page, call toll-free at 1-855-854-5366, or email Judicial.Ethics@jud.ca.gov.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Board seeks input on plan for new bar admissions requirements

Posted By Administration, Thursday, October 2, 2014

By Laura Ernde
California Bar Journal Staff Writer

The Board of Trustees is seeking public comment on a draft plan to implement new competency skills training requirements aimed at better preparing lawyers for the profession.

The proposal calls for:

  • 15 units of practice-based experiential training during law school/apprenticeship option
  • 50 hours of pro bono/reduced fee legal services
  • 10 hours of additional competency training MCLE (minimum continuing legal education) in the first year of admission

The plan was developed by the Task Force on Admissions Regulation Reform Phase II, a 30-member panel chaired by former State Bar President Jon B. Streeter and comprised of attorneys, judges, academics and pro bono directors. Since December, the group has held eight public hearings and sought input from interested parties.

“This is a major milestone for this task force,” State Bar President Craig Holden said after the board’s executive committee authorized the public comment Sept. 29. “I look forward to getting the public’s input on this.”

Comments are due Nov. 3 and may be submitted via email toteri.greenman@calbar.ca.gov or mailed to Teri Greenman, Executive Offices, The State Bar of California, 845 S. Figueroa St., 5th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017.

The board is expected to take up the issue at its next meeting, Nov. 6-7 in San Francisco.

The bar first began moving toward requiring more practical skills training for admission to the bar in February 2012, when the board created the Task Force on Admissions Regulation Reform Phase I, also chaired by Streeter.  

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

SF court clerks authorize strike as negotiations stumble over pay

Posted By Administration, Wednesday, October 1, 2014

San Francisco Superior Court clerks have voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike during contract negotiations, saying court officials have $16 million in their reserve fund but refuse to offer them a raise.

Out of 186 clerks who cast ballots over the last week, 169, or more than 90 percent, voted to authorize their negotiating team to call a strike at their discretion, Steve Stallone, spokesman for Service Employees International Union Local 1021, said Tuesday. He said the union represents 251 clerks, “the lowest-paid workers in the court.”

Trial courts statewide have been reeling from $1 billion in state funding cutbacks over six years. The San Francisco Superior Court laid off 69 employees in October 2011, closed 11 of its 63 courtrooms at 400 McAllister St. and reduced operating hours at the clerks’ offices.

Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget for the fiscal year that started July 1 included a $129 million increase for the trial courts, about half of what court officials said they needed to maintain services. But Ann Donlan, spokeswoman for the San Francisco courts, said last month that they expect to avoid further reductions through next June. She said San Francisco courts have earmarked their remaining reserves to cover retired employees’ health care.

 

Read more from SFGate: http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/SF-court-clerks-authorize-strike-as-negotiations-5791819.php

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Judge dismisses charges against two brothers in 1989 cold case murder

Posted By Administration, Wednesday, October 1, 2014

A judge in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Tuesday dismissed murder charges against two brothers in a 1989 cold case murder at the request of the district attorney's office due to an affair by a prosecutor with a lab technician.

Judge Thang Barrett granted a motion by prosecutors to toss their case against David Zimmer, 67, and Robert Zimmer, 70, in the strangulation death of Cathy Zimmer, whose body was found wrapped in a quilt in her car parked at San Jose International Airport on March 10, 1989.

Robert Zimmer, who had been in the county's Main Jail since his arraignment last February, arrived in court in jail clothing, a long gray beard and gray hair and sat next to Nicole Alvarado, a lawyer filling in for his defense attorney Stephen Defilippis.

Barrett ordered Robert Zimmer released from jail and all pending court hearings for the case vacated. David Zimmer, Cathy's ex-husband who was in jail from March to May, was not at the brief hearing at the Hall of Justice but was represented by his defense counsel Michael Cardoza.

 

Read more from San Jose Mercury News: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_26640403/judge-dismisses-charges-against-two-brothers-1989-cold

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Gov. Brown approves legal help for minors in the country illegally

Posted By Administration, Monday, September 29, 2014

Concerned about unaccompanied children from Central America who have surged into the U.S. illegally this year, Gov. Jerry Brown on Saturday approved legislation providing $3 million in legal aid for them.

 

More than 60,000 unaccompanied children from poverty-stricken and violence-torn areas of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras have been detained so far this year by U.S. Border Patrol agents, and California officials worry they will be deported to unsafe places without getting legal due process.

  

"With the stroke of a pen, Governor Brown reaffirmed California's commitment to doing its part to address the unprecedented humanitarian crisis at border involving Central American youth," said Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) in a statement Saturday. "Deportation for some of these kids is tantamount to a virtual death sentence so it's important that they have access to the adequate legal representation." 

 

Many of the children came to the U.S. to find adult relatives based on false rumors that once they get here the U.S. government would let them stay. 

 

Read more via LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-gov-brown-approves-legal-help-for-minors-in-the-country-illegally-20140927-story.html

 

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Law school dean to the Supreme Court: This love affair is over

Posted By Administration, Monday, September 29, 2014

After nearly four decades as a lawyer and 30 years teaching would-be lawyers, and after writing a leading textbook on constitutional law and helping establish a law school, and after standing before the justices five times on behalf of his clients, Erwin Chemerinsky has fallen out of love with the Supreme Court.

Hard.

His break-up note runs for 342 pages and is called “The Case Against the Supreme Court.” The book makes its regretful message clear at the very beginning:

“We should realize that this is an emperor that truly has no clothes. For too long, we have treated the Court is if they are the high priests of the law, or at least as if they are the smartest and best lawyers in society.”

His conclusion? “The court has frequently failed, throughout American history, at its most important tasks, at its most important moments. This is not easy for me to conclude or to say.”

Read more via the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/law-school-dean-to-the-supreme-court-this-love-affair-is-over/2014/09/28/c258a506-45a4-11e4-b47c-f5889e061e5f_story.html

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 94 of 99
 |<   <<   <  89  |  90  |  91  |  92  |  93  |  94  |  95  |  96  |  97  |  98  |  99
more Calendar

6/22/2018
Using Insurance and Indemnity to Mitigate Risks in Real Estate Transactions

6/28/2018
120 Days to ADR

6/29/2018
Family Law Judgment Practicum: Fine Tuning Judgment Packets for Success

Recent Recognitions
Steven B. Haley2017 Professional Lawyer of the Year
Golnesa MonazamfarBarrister of the Year 2017

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal